Paris Agreement Ineffective

But the more seriously we take the need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, the more we must be angry at the plan for Paris. With so much political capital and so many legacies that are put on the conclusion of an “agreement” – each agreement – the negotiators have chosen an agreement worth less than… Now, certainly less than the cost of a two-week summit in a glamorous European capital. President Trump just kept one of his promises. On Monday, his government began the formal process of withdrawing the United States from the Paris climate agreement. The separation will not be official until November 4, 2020 – the day after the next presidential elections – and many governors and mayors are doing everything in their power to keep the agreement alive in their part of the country. Three years after signing a pioneering climate agreement in Paris, nearly 200 countries are still far from avoiding major global warming in the coming decades. This month, diplomats from around the world are meeting in Katowice, Poland, to discuss stepping up their efforts. Achieving the ambitions outlined in the Paris Agreement is a challenge, but achievable. We already have the technology, but we need to use it quickly. The main obstacle to using the benefits of the transition to clean energy and avoiding serious impacts on climate change remains political will, and this is something we can all do something about. Kyoto Protocol, 2005.

The Kyoto Protocol [PDF], adopted in 1997 and entered into force in 2005, was the first legally binding climate treaty. It called on industrialized countries to reduce emissions by an average of 5% from 1990 levels and set up a system to monitor countries` progress. But the treaty did not force developing countries, including the major CO2 emitters China and India, to take action. The United States signed the agreement in 1998, but never ratified it and then withdrew its signature. At present, the world is not on track to meet the goals of the Paris Agreement. Considerable progress has been made, but all countries need to do more to limit warming to a level well below 2oC. But President Trump has totally denied the Paris agreement and now wants to dismantle Obama-era climate rules, such as efficiency standards for cars and light trucks. And while some states, including New York and California, have their own renewable energy and electric vehicle policies, they may not be enough to fill that gap. Third, the Paris Agreement also provides for a system of transparency and accountability in which the measures taken by countries will be reviewed by other nations.

From 30 November to 11 December 2015, France hosted representatives from 196 countries at the end of the Un Climate Change Conference (UN), one of the largest and most ambitious global meetings ever held. The goal was nothing less than a binding and universal agreement to limit greenhouse gas emissions to levels that would prevent global temperatures from rising more than 2oC above the lower temperature levels set before the start of the industrial revolution. The subject will dominate the Paris discussions. The NDCs, which cover the effective reduction of emissions, are subjective, discretionary and therefore, for the most part, non-negotiable. Not the money. Developing countries expect more than $100 billion in annual funding from this agreement, or they are leaving. (For the scale, this is roughly in line with the OECD`s overall foreign development aid budget.) The treaty contains a number of key elements. First, the goal of the agreement is not only to keep global warming “well below” 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels, but also to continue efforts to keep warming at 1.5 degrees Celsius. This means that global emissions must fall to zero by 2050 in industrialized countries such as Australia.

WordPress Themes